英伟达tegra3相当于（Comparing NVIDIA Tegra 3）

Comparing NVIDIA Tegra 3

NVIDIA Tegra 3 is a powerful chip that is known for its performance and speed. But how does it compare to other processors in the market? Let's take a closer look.

Performance and Speed

NVIDIA Tegra 3 is based on a quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU with a fifth “companion” core, known as the \"Ninja Core\". The CPU clocks in at 1.4 GHz, and is coupled with 1GB of DDR3 memory. This configuration allows for smooth multitasking and fast performance for most daily tasks. However, when compared to the newer chips in the market, the Tegra 3 shows its age.

For example, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, commonly found in high-end smartphones, clocks in at 2.45 GHz and has eight cores, making it faster and more powerful than the Tegra 3. Similarly, the Apple A11 Bionic chip, found in the iPhone X, has six cores and is known for its speed and performance. When it comes to raw performance, the Tegra 3 falls behind the competition.

Graphics

NVIDIA Tegra 3 is known for its prowess in graphics rendering. It has a 12-core GeForce GPU that can handle high-resolution displays and complex graphics-intensive tasks. This makes it ideal for gaming and media consumption. The Tegra 3 is capable of smooth playback of high-definition videos and 3D graphics. When compared to other processors, the Tegra 3 still holds its own, as its GPU is still considered one of the best in its class.

However, newer chips have taken a step further in the graphics department. For example, the Apple A12 Bionic has a four-core GPU that is known for its speed and performance. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, the successor to the Snapdragon 835, has an Adreno 630 GPU which is much faster than the Tegra 3's GPU. When it comes to graphics, the Tegra 3 is adequate for most tasks, but it is no longer the best in its class.

Pricing

One of the biggest advantages of the Tegra 3 is its price. Since it is an older chip, it is much more affordable compared to newer processors that are currently on the market. This makes it an ideal choice for budget devices, such as tablets and smartphones. Additionally, the Tegra 3 is known for its energy efficiency, which makes it a popular choice for portable devices.

When compared to the competition, the Tegra 3 is still a viable option for budget devices. However, it falls short when it comes to performance and graphics. If performance and graphics are a priority, then newer processors would be a better choice. However, if budget is a concern, the Tegra 3 is still a solid option for many devices.